Kouchner Makes Startling Discovery: Lebanon Is A Treacherous Place



Plain Talking

We thank France for trying, but did Kouchner really think Lebanon was a cake walk?


Welcome to the Lebanese jungle…

After paying Mr. Hariri a visit, the French minister taught us today what a diplomatic hair-pulling looks like:

“Everybody was agreed. Everybody said they had agreed. Now I’m amazed, France is amazed, that something is stuck, something is blocked, something is derailed, and I would like everyone to assume their responsibilities,”

Yes, Lebanon tends to do that to you monsieur Kouchner.. But wait, there’s more:

“I would like to know who is not in agreement. I would like to know who has an interest in chaos, who has an interest in the elections not taking place, who has an interest in making it even more complicated for the life of all the Lebanese,”

Mr. Kouchner is not to blame. He just made the grave mistake of assuming that Lebanese politicians care about the general good before their own. What if America was right all the way? What if there is no such thing as compromise in Lebanon?

Also read:

Lebanon Plays Mission Impossible

Related Beirut Spring posts:

• Last August, I argued against France’s promise of a “spectacular opening gesture” towards Syria • A few days later I realized that France and the US were beginning to differ in diagnosing the Lebanese situation • In March, I wrote a post endorsing Nicolas Sarkozy for the French presidency.

Entries (RSS)Do you like this post? Would you like to be always updated with new posts on this website? If so, please subscribe to this blog's RSS feed? (tell me more)


 

Discussion

No comments for “Kouchner Makes Startling Discovery: Lebanon Is A Treacherous Place”

  1. He just made the grave mistake of assuming that Lebanese politicians care about the general good before their own.

    At least with the general, the general good is his own good.

    Posted by Ano | November 19, 2007, 3:59 pm
  2. Hahahahaha, I really feel sorry for Kouchner, he really tried to do his best, and was constantly traveling back and forth.
    I can imagine him complaining to his wife in the morning shouting “F********CK, I HATE THIS COUNTRY!!! THEY ARE NUTTSSS, I DON’T WANT TO GO BACK.”
    I can’t really blame the guy coz he is really dealing with LOKO people!!!

    No for compromise, fight dictatorship and terrorism.

    Posted by Ali | November 19, 2007, 4:23 pm
  3. Here it goes: HA says there will be no agreement unless clAoun agrees. The IDIOT says I am the Only one…No wonder kouchner is befuddled. He apparently does not know of the traditional arab hospitality and stabbing in the back specialty….

    Posted by Danny | November 19, 2007, 4:31 pm
  4. It’s sad, The French care more about Lebanese, than the Lebanese government.
    What exactly have we elected them for again?

    Posted by theCourtFool | November 19, 2007, 5:37 pm
  5. “He just made the grave mistake of assuming that Lebanese politicians care about the general good before their own.”

    I think there is solution - general good has to be tied to their own. Time to build a guillotine and put it up on display in front of president palace.

    Posted by leo | November 19, 2007, 7:06 pm
  6. the poor guy almost popped a vein today on tv I really feel sorry for him but then again this is what amateur diplomacy will get u so dont blame anyone but yr sorry over eager oblibvious to reality self Mr Kouchner.
    The syrians/iranians want a bargain with the americans and they will keep obstructing every possible solution until they talk directly to the good Ol’ US of A.

    Posted by Dania | November 19, 2007, 7:49 pm
  7. Condi was so right, don’t waste time talking to them, lets put a president and support him, militarely if necessary. As usual the French and Europeans laughed at the US and their way of dealing with things. There we go, 12 high european officials came and left beyrouth the past 2 months and the results??? Up yours!!!
    did you like the hommos kouchner? how about some kabbab dalima? Hey merkel, want some baklawa for desert?…

    Posted by Ralf | November 19, 2007, 8:22 pm
  8. @ Danny

    i guess you do not know it is a little bit more complicated. It seems many parties are here involved in the current blocage. It can be a part of the opposition or a part of the majority with geagea for ex refusing consensus

    I guess you do not read the MAEE report (the official reports of the french governement). They state as following:

    “Je le répète, les Syriens étaient d’accord. Je voudrais savoir qui n’est pas d’accord. Je voudrais savoir qui a intérêt au chaos, qui a intérêt à ce que l’élection ne puisse avoir lieu. Qui a intérêt à ce que ce soit plus compliqué encore pour la vie de tous les Libanais. Nous sommes des amis des Libanais, cela ne veut pas dire que nous ne sommes pas des amis des chrétiens. Nous sommes les amis des chrétiens aussi. Je voudrais savoir qui bloque, qui portera la responsabilité. Celui qui portera la responsabilité d’avoir bloqué ce processus accepté par tout le monde portera la responsabilité de la déstabilisation du Liban et de ses conséquences régionales. Je voudrais qu’il en prenne conscience, qu’ils en prennent conscience, et qu’ils soient sûrs que la France le fera savoir au monde entier.

    Q - Vous pensez que le général Aoun est derrière ce blocage ?

    R - Je ne parle pas du général Aoun, je l’ai rencontré. Je parle en général de tous les Libanais et je rencontrerai à nouveau le général Aoun. Je ne pense pas qu’il soit responsable de ce blocage”

    So it seems it is more complicated then what the press reports.

    Posted by frenchy | November 19, 2007, 8:33 pm
  9. moreover i m having some interrogation toward again the lebanese medias and an nahar especially.
    The sentence stated in the beginning by my dear college in blogging Moustafa is like a “morceau choisi” which is incomplete as all the paragraph is more interesting …

    for ex kouchner is very fond of ironical formulas and to understand him it is better to have all the sentences he pronounced…

    Posted by frenchy | November 19, 2007, 8:36 pm
  10. We are not going to do a “commentaire compose” now for what Kouchner said: for it to be an agreement there must be two parts that agree, and more importantly a middle ground accepted by both. Unfortunately the middle ground is not there because each has and is sticking to his beliefs. The 14 will not accept Aoun for president and the 8 wants only Aoun for president. End of story!
    Now lets put the talking aside and lets see some muscles!

    Posted by Ralf | November 19, 2007, 9:09 pm
  11. Wake up and smell the cafe Frenchy.

    You’re still trying to defend Aoun’s madness, I feel for you it’s getting harder.

    Goddammit, Aoun said two days ago that even a 2/3 election is not good enough for him. Enough bullshit, defend that!

    Posted by JoseyWales | November 19, 2007, 9:12 pm
  12. I keep telling you - it’s a “language problem”. The so-called ‘opposition’ says “compromise” & “consensus” and that means …. “give Nasrallah what he demands”. Nothing less.

    Aoun is almost out of this deal and he knows it. He is not Nasrallah’s choice and that became evident in the “negotiations’. Suleiman is the choice. The USA has a very serious “red line” on this whole matter. Bush will not negotiate with Syria over Lebanon, and with Iran over the nuclear deal. He won’t do it. IF Lebanon caves to Nasrallah - the USA will walk away and check and see how you are doing in 10 years or so. That means the International Tribunal is very at risk - I don’t Hariri will risk that.

    Posted by Ace | November 19, 2007, 10:12 pm
  13. @ Joey
    It seems you are not reading the rought news to make your own analysis.

    Things are more complicated then what is just said and we are assisting to a recomposition of the lebanese political scene.

    Just check out the things eclipsed by the presidential election, going on in the Baabda Aley circonscription…

    Posted by frenchy | November 19, 2007, 11:03 pm
  14. The secret is the puppet-moron Najad who threatened Sarkozy couple of days ago of destroying the French interest in Lebanon, if France keep pressure on Iran in regards to nukes.
    In other words destroying Lebanon and accusing all non-hizballah as being related to French or American interest, therefor shall be killed! Persian Najad made judgment and we shall obey! No respect to Lebanon and in its sovereignty and the will of its people. How? Of course, senior jackass Khameni will give the orders, via Welayat El Faquih fatwa, to junior jackass Nassrallah hiding in his cave in Dahyié. And yallah, the terrorist militia will start terror and proxy terror (Syrian Mukhabarat, Aoun etc.)

    Would Hizballah surprise everyone and play rational? We will know very soon. If that the case, this is Al Taqia!

    Posted by Sam | November 20, 2007, 2:07 am
  15. again, the entire sorry saga has been heading towards confrontation for the last 12 months. for all with any sense of realism, what is happening now is not a surprise. perhaps the fine detail will keep us all guessing, however the end result is confrontation for certain elements are playing for keeps.

    Posted by The Other Tony | November 20, 2007, 10:28 am
  16. The sad truth is that- we wouldn’t be in this situation had the Israelis not made the fundamental mistake to attack all of Lebanon last year, instead of just Hezbollah.
    To say that Hezbollah’s position was emboldened and strengthened after the July is an understatement.
    The scenario that should have happened was that Hezbollah should have been cornered on one side from Israel, and on the other from the Lebanese themselves who would have revolted against them.
    There is nothing Lebanese about Hezbollah, at least not the Lebanon I grew-up in.
    I hope the Majority will be strong enough and hold-on to their position. Aoun will sway like the wind later. How can he turn against his fellow Christians afterwards?
    Let democracy prevail, and let non-sense get burried in a coffin back to Tehran or Damascus.

    Posted by Libanus | November 20, 2007, 7:55 pm
  17. [...] But one can’t help but ask: Does Mr. Sarkozy have the ability and wherewithal to face the Assad regime? Le President hyperactif - le Lapin Duracel as he’s known in France- strikes the portrait of a tough-talking man in charge who’s nevertheless anxious for quick results. His dealing with the Bulgarian nurses crisis, the French strikers and recently, the Lebanese crisis, indicate that he’s willing to strike deals at the expense of some declared ideals. [...]

    Posted by Sarkozy’s Empty Threats? | The Beirut Spring, a Lebanese Blog | December 15, 2007, 10:21 pm

Post a comment

Hello, my name is Mustapha and I blog in The Beirut Spring about Lebanese society and politics. I started in February 2005 after the killing of P.M. Rafik Hariri.

Rss

Subscribe
Subscribers so far:

 

Latest Posts

Will You Register Your Name?
August 19, By Mustapha
Hezbollah’s MOU With Salafists
Hezbollah’s MOU With Salafists
August 18, By Mustapha
Nassrallah Taunts Israel On Georgia
Nassrallah Taunts Israel On Georgia
August 16, By Mustapha
Catch 22 On The Shebaa Farms
Catch 22 On The Shebaa Farms
August 14, By Mustapha

More From the Beirutspring network

Subscribe

Lebanese Bloggers

Middle Eastern Bloggers

RSS Subscribers

Blog Featured In