This post is more than 15 years old
Remember that politics move quickly, and people and their opinions evolve.
Artificial Stability Is Bad
April 28, 2011 · Mustapha Hamoui
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of the popular “Black Swan” book, makes an elegant argument in Foreign Affairs against the kind of stability imposed by dictatorships:
Systems that have artificially suppressed volatility tend to become extremely fragile, while at the same time exhibiting no visible risks. In fact, they tend to be too calm and exhibit minimal variability as silent risks accumulate beneath the surface.
Although the stated intention of political leaders and economic policymakers is to stabilise the system by inhibiting fluctuations, the result tends to be the opposite. These artificially constrained systems become prone to ‘Black Swans’ — that is, they become extremely vulnerable to large-scale events that lie far from the statistical norm and were largely unpredictable to a given set of observers.
Such environments eventually experience massive blowups, catching everyone off-guard and undoing years of stability
Have you ever wondered why Arab policy makers love “stability” so much?