Beirut Spring Logo

Blogging Lebanese politics, business and society since 2005

9 thoughts on “Why You Can’t Partition Lebanon

  1. I have to disagree with you on this one (although I usually agree with your analysis on most things!). I think the very fact that you can produce this map demonstrates that Lebanon can be partitioned. Read about it on my blog.

  2. This is wishful thinking Mustapha, not a reasoned response. Why can’t Lebanon be partitioned? And why is partition to be viewed as an abomination?

    Even the Catholic Church has come to accept divorce (sure, it’s called “marriage annulment”, but in the end the difference is in semantics and an “annulment” is partition by other means.)

    When gangrene is at the brink of consuming a salubrious body, amputation becomes the only solution… Regional autonomy (with all that it entails in terms of minority cultural and linguistic rights) is the only system that has maintained national sanity (and civil peace) for places like Switzerland, Canada, and the Czechoslovak Federative Republic among other places; and in the case of Switzerland, this has been the case for the past 500 years. I don’t see how Switzerland can be partitioned, but not Lebanon. Please explain.

    • When I hear partition, I think south sudan, I don’t think Switzerland, or for that matter, the United States, which employ federal systems.

      I support a federal system with devolved powers..

  3. I lived in Switzerland for more than 10 years. In my experience the Zurichers and the Genevois love each other as much as the people of Tripoli and Dahiye. But they live with each other because the system (Confederation, not a Federation) creates an environment of constructive competition. Lebanon as a unitary state has failed and is faced with one of two options now: Somalia or Switzerland. I hope the choice is clear.

Comments are closed.