One of my readers sent me an email with what he thinks is the absolutely most important part of the Sayyed’s presentation:
Nasrallah affirmed there was a Hizbullah unit operating in the St. George area day of the assassination…He showed alleged Israeli aerial spy videos of Beirut and spoke of an Israeli spy in the area to provide the rationale for a Hizbullah cell being present in the location during the assassination and which he and others expect the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) now has solid proof on. He says they were present to track an Israeli collaborator.
In other words, Hezbollah’s mention of an Israeli collaborator in the crime scene was both an offensive and a defensive move.
Thanks F.

Hello, my name is Mustapha and I've been blogging about Lebanese society, business and politics since February 2005.
That’d certainly be a smart move… plausible too.
well they should have an explanation ready, notice btw how the country within a country principle became of second nature.. lol
Evidence: “something legally submitted to a tribunal to ascertain the truth of a matter” (Wester’s New Collegiate Dictionary)
The tribunal isn’t located in either Israel or Iran. Newspaper editorials won’t decide the outcome; the STL will. If the evidence is legitimate it should be submitted. Failure to do so is a curious approach and leaves the door of doubt about it’s authenticity wide open.
Very interesting conclusion…