Walid Phares: The Syrian-Jihadi Highway In Lebanon



Links

Walid Phares, a seasoned intelligence columnist explains in the World Defense Review why it is consistent with Syria’s history to have tactical alliances with ideologically incompatible groups like Fateh Al Islam.

He begins by marveling at the “curious ‘debate’ (..) growing rapidly among a number of Western-based analysts about the “impossibility” of the existence of Syrian Jihadi-Salafist links”

He then invites “those who cannot fathom how a Baathist secular — and socialist — regime engages in alliances with Islamist forces, fights them, befriend one and represses another”, to review the history of Hafez Assad between 1970 and 2000:

For 37 years the Assad dynasty practiced [deception] as well as cross-ideological alliances. The regime supported the PLO between 1970 and 1976, before Assad ordered the bloody conflict with Arafat in 1976. Briefly claiming coordination with Right wing Christian parties in 1976-1977, Assad bombed the PLO in 1978. Then using Amal against the Palestinians, the regime supported its own “Palestinian” factions.

Allying himself with Iran and Hizbollah in 1982, the regime wanted to contain Hizbollah in Beirut in 1986. Fighting against the Lebanese (Christian) Forces since the 1970s, the Syrians backed a faction among them (Elie Hobeika) in 1986, fought another (Samir Geagea) until 1989, claimed to befriend the latter for a short time before ordering oppression of their partisans as of 1993.

Assad fought the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, but funded the Islamists in Lebanon and Palestine. His regime claimed it was secular while becoming the single strategic ally of Iran’s Islamist elite. In Lebanon and after the withdrawal of the bulk of his army, Bashar kept his entire apparatus: from Shia Hizbollah and Amal, some Druse factions, and a few Christian warlords, to a large range of pro-Sunni politicians and groupings. How can the Assad intelligence net achieve this?

And here’s a juicy bit for contemporary Lebanese observers:

And as of spring 2005, a main former anti-Syrian politician was added to the panoply of Syrian (and Iranian) political assets in the country: General Michel Aoun. However, perhaps the most advantageous “grabs” by the Baathist Mukhabarat were Sunni Islamists, who should have been ideologically on the other side of Assad, but who, with the attraction of a “deity” — dollars and power — have agreed to line up with a Taghut

For more, read the entire thing..

Entries (RSS)Do you like this post? Would you like to be always updated with new posts on this website? If so, please subscribe to this blog's RSS feed? (tell me more)


 

Discussion

No comments for “Walid Phares: The Syrian-Jihadi Highway In Lebanon”

  1. Walid Phares ? !!! Please Mustapha , get real and don’t cheapen your blog with trash from Phares ilk .

    Let Principle, Not Politics, Guide Enforcement of Law
    Author: Ismail Royer Publishing date: 23.06.2003 21:05

    The idea that an Arab-American professor’s extracurricular activities would include low-key support for Middle East extremism may come as a shock to some.

    This Florida professor founded a non-profit organization with the outward intent of promoting “human rights and democracy for all people in the Middle East,” but which instead operated as a virtual political front group in the West for an umbrella group of armed outfits that specialized in the targeting of innocent civilians.

    The organization helped bring officials of these groups to the United States, and to shuttle them around the country to promote their agenda. One of those whose visits the professor facilitated was the chief of a militant group described by US government agencies as “terrorist” and “extremist,” a group that caused the deaths of more than 3,000 men, women, and children in just one operation.

    The visiting gentlemen also happened to be a Middle East-based leader of the professor’s organization. But that Florida professor, Dr. Walid Phares, isn’t sitting in solitary confinement like Dr. Sami Al-Arian, the University of South Florida lecturer awaiting trial for allegedly aiding the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). Instead, he carries on unhindered as a professor at Florida Atlantic University, an MSNBC commentator, and a darling of the neoconservative movement made so politically fashionable these days by its ascendance in the Bush Administration.

    It has been said that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. That might help explain why the enthusiastic support for extremist pro-Israel groups by Dr. Phares, an Arab Christian, has generated nothing like the firestorm that engulfed Dr. Al-Arian, who happens to be a Palestinian Muslim. The political support both professors reportedly provided for Middle Eastern factions might be seen as sinister support for violence or freedom of expression, depending on the observer’s point of view. A

    side from the difference in religion and politics between the two men, there’s little to distinguish them at face value. Both men immigrated to the US, treading the well-worn path of embracing American values and lifestyle while continuing to advocate for the passionately held causes of the Old World. Both are brilliant intellectuals, performing well as leaders and spokesmen for their ethnic communities.

    The difference in the government’s treatment of the two men is clearly attributable to the fact that one man’s political views are in vogue and the other’s are not. After all, if sheer body count were to determine who were to remain free and who were to be jailed, it might be Dr. Al Arian analyzing the Middle East on MSNBC while Dr. Phares languished in solitary confinement.

    The Phalange and the Guardians of the Cedar, two of the groups Dr. Phares and his World Lebanese Organization have been aligned with, were responsible for the massacre of thousands of innocent civilians in Palestinian refugee camps in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

    As far back as 1985, the research wing of the US Congress labeled the Guardians a terrorist group. It is a fact of life that nations routinely use political interest and expediency, as opposed to moral principle, to shape their relationships with other nations, groups, and causes.

    For better or worse, Israel is a close ally of the United States, and so those states or groups Israel is in conflict with can expect to land on America’s bad side, and those who are friendly toward Israel will receive a pass.

    Americans might be forced to accept double standards in our foreign policy, but it should never be this way on the home front. Whether we are to tolerate or criminalize the intellectual or material embroilment in foreign conflicts by those in the US, it should be so regardless of which side of the conflict they come down on.

    Let America’s Dr. Al-Arians, Dr. Phareses, Catholic partisans of the Irish Republican Army, and Tamil Tiger supporters be free to legally support their political factions in the Old World, or let them all be jailed.

    If the American principles of equal protection under the law and freedom of speech are to have meaning, then in our application of the law, let moral principle, not political expediency, be our guide.

    http://atrueword.com/index.php/article/articleview/60/1/1/

    Posted by US | June 2, 2007, 9:04 pm
  2. I take Sy Hersh words any day over such characters as Walid Phares .

    Seymour Hersh: U.S. Indirectly Backed Islamist Militants Fighting Lebanese Army

    http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/24/143208

    Posted by US | June 2, 2007, 9:13 pm
  3. Ah well, Mustapha you tried, guess there are people who would rather carress their personal biases with garbage like that Hersh article (which has already been disproven) to actually allow their opinions to conform to reality.

    Way to go “US”! (Sarcasm)

    Posted by Arabic Coffee Pot | June 2, 2007, 11:25 pm
  4. I didn’t read the article “US” posted - but I concur with “US” (to a degree) that Phares isn’t someone you should quote in order to make a point. It forms the basis of an unstable argument.

    Posted by M. | June 3, 2007, 12:39 am
  5. AHHHH!!! Well said “US” you have figured it out ITS ANOTHER GOD DAMN CONSPIRACY led by the JOOOOZ!!!…don’t mind that you are as narrow minded and foolish as anyone who relates this piece of nonsense as “fact”….->The Phalange and the Guardians of the Cedar, two of the groups Dr. Phares and his World Lebanese Organization have been aligned with, were responsible for the massacre of thousands of innocent civilians in Palestinian refugee camps in the late 1970s and early 1980s.” Not that I have any love for these two particular parties but PALEEEZE…was anyone innocent during the Civil war…I think not especially the Palestinians…unless you forget….a great piece of shit once said…the road to jerusalem leads through jounieh…

    By the way Ismail Royer is part and parcel of CAIR which is pure hate…find out where he is right now (AND WHY) before repeating his nonsense too

    Allah Maek ya failasoof

    AYEASH LUBNAN!!

    Shunkleash

    Posted by shunkleash | June 3, 2007, 4:22 am
  6. Guys, just realize that Ismael “Randall” Royer is serving a sentence for Terrorism in the US. In 1999, when he posted that article on Walid Phares, he was assigned the mission of trashing all those who were warning about Iran, Hezbollah and the Jihadi Terrorists. So when someone now refers to Royer to attack Phares, he/she are basically using a Terrorist material to attack an expert on Terrorism. Goodness, do you think the readers are idiots. First google Royer and read his indictment before you stupidly post his material. Also Phares wasn’t in the Guardians of the Cedars nor was he in the militia. he had his own party, which by the way was on the left, even though based in East Beirut then..just don’t take people as idiots in the internet age.

    Posted by Sami Abdallah | June 3, 2007, 7:25 am
  7. You know you have a 500 pound gorrila as your neighbor with rocky relationship, then why not dry up your enemy’s resources from within, with a new democratic, fair political structure. If Sunnis with its Christian coalition thinks they are better, more democratic, then why not back up the rehtoric with action. I can’t understand how this alliance claim the moral authority to define and decide what is best for Lebanon when it falls short on the most basic test of democracy.

    Posted by easterner | June 3, 2007, 10:37 am
  8. Good job US! A classic! When you can’t put a dent in the foresight and spot on prognoses an academic like Prof. Phares has been making for the past 15 years, let loose the silly CAIR-style ad hominem. A crackpot convict like Royer CERTAINLY bears out your bird-brained claims!
    It must suck for you and YOUR “ilk” that a number of courageous academics are finally breaking ranks with the silly apologists of their ivory towers and outing you and your hateful ideology. Good luck stemming the tide of truth, kid! Truth is a bitch, ain’t it!

    Posted by Anonymous | June 3, 2007, 2:48 pm
  9. You’re funny US! I would pay to read the drivel of clowns like you. Ha ha, “Please Mustapha [pretty please], get real and don’t cheapen your blog with trash from Phares ilk”… and YOU are clearly enriching this blog! Strange how “straws” and “camels” can ruing your eyesight. But thanks US, I needed a good laugh.

    Posted by Louis-Noel Harfouche | June 3, 2007, 4:00 pm
  10. Louis Noel Harfouche has it right on target..for the Iranian operatives online have been paid in oil dollars to trash all those who are opening the eyes of civil societies in the region and the public in the West. The fear in Tehran and in Damascus is that the international opinion sees finally who is are the fascists in the region and who are their apologists in the West. Tehran is spending millions from its petro dollars to win the war of public opinion, but its operatives are incredibly dumb. Watch the clown from Montreal, Awarke, gesticulating on al Jazeera, and that other clown in San Francisco, Asaad Abikhalil, jumping on al Manar at the rescue of Hezbollah’s image. Too late. All the Iranian and Syrian mukhabaraat can’t do much for the battle of the image. The game is over. With free bloggers and connections into Lebanon, Syria and Iran’s civil societies all the slogans and creepy trash can’t do much to win it..

    Posted by Sami Abdallah | June 3, 2007, 9:17 pm
  11. Focus on the content you idiots!
    All you do is attack the messenger in stead of reading his message.

    No matter what Phares’ history is, the guy has a point.

    Posted by Me | June 3, 2007, 9:29 pm
  12. Fares is totally right, as usual.

    Posted by Vox P. | June 4, 2007, 12:36 am

Post a comment

Hello, my name is Mustapha and I blog in The Beirut Spring about Lebanese society and politics. I started in February 2005 after the killing of P.M. Rafik Hariri.

Rss

Subscribe
Subscribers so far:

 

Latest Posts

How To Follow The Lebanese Elections On Twitter
June 7, By Mustapha
Now Updating From Twitter @beirutspring
April 16, By Mustapha
Worried About A Damascus Washington Rapprochement? You Needn’t Be
March 5, By Mustapha
Alarabiya is Not Aljazeera, and It Matters.
January 27, By Mustapha

Lebanese Bloggers

Middle Eastern Bloggers

RSS Subscribers

Blog Featured In