A War Of Necessity



opinion

The Army is balancing the need to minimize civilian casualties with the need to aggressively assert its authority. Let’s all hope it can pull that off successfully.

Shock and Awe ( Photo: New York Times)

You don’t have to be the soft-hearted type to cringe when an organized army bombs away at a refugee camp cramped with civilians. It begs your creativity to find another, more peaceful solution. After all, the civilians don’t have anything to do with it.

Alas, a clear moral situation this is not.

Neither the army nor the Lebanese people can afford letting the terrorists get away with slaughtering soldiers in daylight for just being that: Lebanese soldiers. It is obvious that the attacks were aimed at the army’s authority. If the army shows signs of weakness, it will invite further attacks on it and we will lose the very institution that holds the peace and keeps this divided country together.

All “peaceful” and political solutions, including intermediary negotiations with Palestinian factions to hand over the perpetrators to justice, have failed. Ample time was given to the civilians to leave, but now, it is time for an overwhelming, swift and precise operation.

The faster this ends the better. The militants have no other option but to surrender. The faster they do it, the less innocent Palestinians will die.

Entries (RSS)Do you like this post? Would you like to be always updated with new posts on this website? If so, please subscribe to this blog's RSS feed? (tell me more)


 

Discussion

No comments for “A War Of Necessity”

  1. The sooner the better.

    The longer this thing takes, more factions might start mobilizing to make attacks on the army from other camps.

    You don’t want the syndrome to spread.

    Posted by The Lebanese Connection | June 1, 2007, 4:45 pm
  2. I heard that most of the civillian population (quite an amount0 already fled and that about 6.000 civillians are still in the place.

    I also heard that 14 died in the battle (of which two soldiers). Can you confirm this?

    Furthermore I wonder what you think when you hear “refugee camp” in the news while you see huge buildings which have been built and people seem to have an ok live there - not the live you would expect “a refugee” to have.

    Posted by Suzanne | June 1, 2007, 5:18 pm
  3. Well suzanne, A refugee camp, just like any settlement that lasts 60 years will develop from a tent city to a full-fledged concrete jungle.

    Posted by beirutspring | June 1, 2007, 5:32 pm
  4. So with that, the whole ME is a refugee camp?

    Just kidding…

    Posted by another_someone | June 1, 2007, 6:36 pm
  5. @beirutspring, i know many settlements or refugee camps which just melted into the country evolving into a city and is called a city nowadays as well.
    Why would one continue calling those places settlements or refugee camps after 60 years or more?

    Posted by Suzanne | June 1, 2007, 9:58 pm
  6. Mustapha, I read quite a good article by a Syrian human-rights activists. I agree with her on this.
    (it’s in Arabic)
    http://www.middleeasttransparent.com/article.php3?id_article=963&var_recherche=%D8%B1%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86+%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%86

    Posted by Mazen | June 1, 2007, 10:14 pm
  7. Good article Mazen and very relevant! thanks for sharing it

    Posted by beirutspring | June 2, 2007, 7:05 am
  8. Mustapha, I am sorry for what Lebanon is going through. It seems that Lebanon can not find a moment to breath peacefully. Of course, Fatah guys are the bad guys, but is Lebanon suffering from a deeper problem that this violent arm conflict and others are the symptoms? I believe it is! Lebanon is not in sync with reality and that is its biggest weakness as a state and nation. Imagine disarming Hezbullah which is the wish of Sunnis and its prime minister Faoud Siniora. Lebanon needs to update its political structure to allow anyone become prime minister, president and speaker of the parliament. End discrimination and hypocracy. That will serve as incentive for all groups and people of Lebanon to stand for and support their beautiful, fragil nation and disincentive to serve others.

    Posted by easterner | June 2, 2007, 7:05 am
  9. “Why would one continue calling those places settlements or refugee camps after 60 years or more?”

    There are many cities in England with names like Winchester, Lancaster, Doncaster, etc. These come from the Latin word “castra” meaning a (military) camp. So they are still called “camps” 2000 years after they were first established as camps.

    Names stick, apparently.

    Posted by Don Cox | June 2, 2007, 10:08 am
  10. Don,

    Worcester was given it’s name in the 7th century, by Anglo-Saxons. Same with Gloucester:

    Wiogoraceastre bið burg Englalandes; and hēo ligeþ on ðǣre Sæferne. Hīe is norþ Gleaweceastere.

    And most of the other variants of “ceastre”. You are probably correct on the origin of “ceastre” in the English language being from Latin, but the Romans did not name those towns and cities. The Anglo-Saxons did. It is a good point you raise, but those were never refugee camps. They were walled cities and walled towns. The Anglo-Saxons did not build castles until feudal times. Note, the word “town” itself comes from the old Anglo-Saxon and Old Norse word “tun” which means “an enclosed place” - towns were also fortified. And there are many cities in England that end in “-ton” - signifying a town.

    Doesn’t really seem relevant to so-called refugee camps in the ME, to me. Especially since the UN actually does still consider them to be refugee camps, not former refugee camps.

    Posted by Craig | June 2, 2007, 9:19 pm
  11. I raised this question, because I believe that if you continue calling a person dumb and stupid, it will highly probably remain dumb and stupid. If you continue believing your ill, you will never get better. If you continue believing you are a refugee (even though two generations back came to live in Lebanon), you will remain a refugee. If that is the case all members of nation X not living in nation X but in diaspora, will remain refugees (political, economical, whatsoever). If that is the case I can call myself also a refugee. But I will not. I am not. I do not consider myself to be one. And I am able to grow. Because people around me dont see me as a parasite. Dont see me as a poor refugee woman. Dont see me as part of some lower standard. But as equal. With equal opportunities and equal rights. Perhaps it’s time UNRWA should stop calling the grandchildren of refugees “refugees” but start treating them for what they are. Human beings willing to start a live and grow up.

    Now, with this terminology alone only segregation is created.

    Posted by Suzanne | June 4, 2007, 12:02 pm

Post a comment

Hello, my name is Mustapha and I blog in The Beirut Spring about Lebanese society and politics. I started in February 2005 after the killing of P.M. Rafik Hariri.

Rss

Subscribe
Subscribers so far:

 

Latest Posts

Will You Register Your Name?
August 19, By Mustapha
Hezbollah’s MOU With Salafists
Hezbollah’s MOU With Salafists
August 18, By Mustapha
Nassrallah Taunts Israel On Georgia
Nassrallah Taunts Israel On Georgia
August 16, By Mustapha
Catch 22 On The Shebaa Farms
Catch 22 On The Shebaa Farms
August 14, By Mustapha

More From the Beirutspring network

Subscribe

Lebanese Bloggers

Middle Eastern Bloggers

RSS Subscribers

Blog Featured In